The best thing about the Democratic Presidential hopeful debate is that it is over. I want to hear those fools debating even less than I want to hear the Republicans talking their game. Let’s start by summing up the leading candidates, shall we?
Hillary Clinton – Sociopath, reverse carpetbagger, socialist, powermonger, dangerous. Hillary would sell her own mother for a vote, and she would definitely destroy any individual in the name of "common good." Common good as defined by Hillary is anything that advances the fortunes of Hillary herself. If you want a sociopath with no soul in the White House, she’s the leading choice. This women changes positions more than a two dollar whore on a busy Saturday evening.
Barack Obama – Typical leftist. Barack wants to fix social ills. Problem: he wants to do it with your money. Barack is probably the least offensive of the three leading Democratic candidates, but like the others, his solution to any problem or perceived problem is to grow government. Government does not fix problems, it merely takes ownership of them and manages them. Once a government department is created, it will exist in perpetuity until the next revolution cycle destroys it. Barack will just grow and grow government. Vote for him if you want GDP to shrink and taxes to go up.
John Edwards – Professional vampire. Litigators are the modern day vampires of our society. John Edwards has made his fortunes by breaking the backs of others, purportedly in the name of justice. The truth is, this guy is a killer. He latches on to whole classes of people and drains them financially. There is no reason to suspect putting him in charge would suddenly change his behavior. It would just give him access to wider and wider groups of potential victims. Vote for John Edwards if you support the vampire class and want the country to became a dry, empty shell devoid of vitality.
The only candidate of note (in my mind) among the Democratic herd is Mike Gravel. Why? He called earmarks an abomination. They are definitely that, and so much more. Imagine being able to rob a bank the way Congress robs the American people – you walk in, hand your note to the teller, and then, in a leisurely fashion, debate how much money you want. Each robber gets to add his or her own demands. They get to take their time because they know the teller is a pushover and the cops aren’t coming; the cops work for the thieves. That is my earmarks analogy.
Now that you have my reality synopsis under your belt, feel free to read the pap mainstream summaries:
I’m getting sick thinking about how poor our choices are these days. I better go now.