Today’s sixth most popular phrase in the blogosphere is “female orgasm.”
The article that spawned all this discussion of that elusive little beast states:
But the Darwinian logic behind the female orgasm has remained elusive. Women can have sexual intercourse and even become pregnant – doing their part for the perpetuation of the species – without experiencing orgasm. So what is its evolutionary purpose?”
Am I the only one who finds it ironic that anyone who spends their time investigating the female orgasm in this manner is likely not experiencing them firsthand?
Another fine quote from the article goes:
Nipples in men are similarly vestigial.”
Please read the full article for lots of clitoral stimulation. Here’s a link to the author’s book on the subject.
In any case, it’s amusing to me that my nipples are vestigial and that female orgasms have no evolutionary purpose. I guess the feminists will have to admit that creationism makes more sense in light of the revelations we’ve all been given. I’ll also bet Dr. Lloyd gets a lot of action when she does the whole bar scene thing.
